O uso de novos meios de tecnologia no processo penal da Romênia

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v5i3.250

Palavras-chave:

meios tecnológicos, prova digital, questões processuais, direitos processuais, limites constitucionais.

Resumo

O novo quadro legal criado em 2014, quando da entrada em vigor do novo Código de Processo Penal na Romênia, deixou aberta uma nova forma de aproximação à justiça criminal. Nesse contexto legal, as autoridades judiciais estão mais habituadas a usar os novos meios tecnológicos de modo a não infringir os direitos processuais das partes durante o julgamento, sabendo que o uso de meios ou protocolos ilegais, assinados pela acusação em conjunto com o serviço de informação da Romênia, é proibido pelo Tribunal Constitucional da Romênia. No presente estudo, analisam-se alguns aspectos dos novos meios tecnológicos que são atualmente usados na justiça penal, tanto no plano legislativo como jurisprudencial. O propósito principal deste estudo é analisar o efeito dos novos meios tecnológicos, incluindo a prova digital, utilizados em julgamentos criminais na Romênia, bem como discutir as consequências legais da sua utilização. Alguns aspetos práticos foram sublinhados tendo em conta a eficiência desses novos meios tecnológicos. Apresentam-se ainda algumas propostas de lege ferenda de modo potenciar a realização do processo penal.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Delia Magherescu, Gorj Bar Association, Romania
    Doctor in Law since 2005 awarded at the State University of Moldova, Republic of Moldova

Referências

ALECU, Gheorghe; BARBANEAGRA, Alexei, Reglementarea penală și investigarea criminalistică a infractiunilor din domeniul informatic, Bucharest: Pinguin Book Publishing House, 2006.

BRITZ, Marjie T., Computer Forensics and Cyber Crime: An Introduction, New Jersey: Perason Education, 2013.

CAMPANA, Paolo, Understanding Then Responding to Italian Organized Crime Operations across Territories, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, Vol. 7, Issue 3/2013, pp. 316-325, https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pat012

CONNERS, Kerry B., Warrants for Videotape Surveillance Issuable Despite Lack of Statutory Authority, St. John's Law Review: vol. 54, no. 4/1980, available online at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2418&context=lawreview (accessed on 18 May 2019)

CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA republished in the Official Journal of Romania, no. 669 of 22 September 2003, Bucharest: Themis Publishing House, 2003.

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS, Jurisprudence of admitting decisions, available online at: https://www.ccr.ro/jurisprudenta-decizii-de-admitere (accessed on 17 May 2019)

DUSEK, Libor, Time to punishment: The effects of a shorter criminal procedure on crime rates, International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 43/2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.04.007

GALETTA, Antonella The changing nature of the presumption of innocence in today's surveillance societies: rewrite human rights or regulate the use of surveillance technologies?, Belfast: European Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2/2013, available online at: http://ejlt.org/article/view/221/377 (accessed on 14 May 2019)

GOUNEV, Philip; RUGGIERO, Vincenzo, Corruption and Organized Crime in Europe. Illegal Partnerships, London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2012.

INTRODUCTORY GUIDE of Applying Legal Regulations regarding the Digital Criminality, Bucharest: INTERNEWS RITI dot-GOV, 2004, available online at: http://www.riti-internews.ro/ro/ghid.htm (accessed on 17 May 2019).

JAIDEV, Ms., Brady Ruling, 1963 U.S. Supreme Court: Sifting from being heard to open trial American and Indian Context, International Journal of Research, vol. 05, Issue 01/2018, available online at: https://journals.eduindex.org/index.php/ijr/article/view/11807/11144 (accessed on 16 May 2019)

JURISPRUDENTA CEDO of Strasbourg, European Court of Human Rights, 2019. https://jurisprudentacedo.com/respectarea-vietii-private-si-familiale.html

LAW NO. 135/2010 on the Code of penal procedure of Romania, published in the Official Journal of Romania, no. 486 of 15 July 2010, entered into force on February 1, 2014.

MAGHERESCU, Delia, Recunoasterea vinovatiei si aplicarea pedepsei, Bucharest: Hamangiu Publishing House, 2019.

MICLEA, Damian, Cunoasterea crimei organizate, Ploiesti: Pygmalion Publishing House, 2001.

OLTEANU, Gabriel Ion; RUIU, Marin, Tectica criminalistica, Bucharest: AIT Laboratories Publishing House, 2009.

REKHIS, Slim; BOUDRIGA, Noureddine, Visibility: A Novel Concept for Characterizing Provable Network Digital Evidences, International Journal of Security and Networks, No. 4/2009, available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220080823_Visibility_A_novel_concept_for_characterising_provable_network_digital_evidences (accessed on 21 May 2019)

SANCHEZ, Juan Carlos Ochoa, The Rights of Victims in Criminal Justice Proceedings for Serious Human Rights Violations, Brill/ Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.

SELEA, Mircea Mugurel, Application of the art. 102 (2) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code in relation to special surveillance measures listed under the art. 138 (1) (a) and (c) of the Criminal Procedure Code enforced before the publication in the Official Journal, Revista de Stiinte Politice, Craiova: Universitaria Publishing House, Issue no. 53/2017, available online at: https://cis01.central.ucv.ro/revistadestiintepolitice/files/numarul53_2017/10.pdf (accessed on 21 May 2019).

SUIAN, Mihai, Unele probleme privind folosirea probelor digitale in procesul penal. Bucharest: Doctrina si Jurisprudenta, No. 1/2019.

SUN, Jia-Rong; SHIH, Mao-Lin; HWANG, Min-Shiang, A Survey of Digital Evidences Forensic and Cybercrime Investigation Procedure, Taichung: International Journal of Network Security, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2015, available online at: http://ijns.jalaxy.com.tw/contents/ijns-v17-n5/ijns-2015-v17-n5-p497-509.pdf (accessed on 21 May 2019).

TRECHSEL, Stefan; SUMMERS, Sarah J., Human Rights in criminal Proceedings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

TULKENS, Francoise, The Paradoxical Relationship between Criminal Law and Human Rights, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 9, Issue 3/2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr028

UDROIU, Mihail; SLAVOIU, Radu; PREDESCU, Ovidiu, Tehnici speciale de investigare in justitia penala, Bucharest: C.H.Beck Publishing House, 2009.

Downloads

Publicado

31.10.2019

Edição

Seção

DOSSIÊ: Novas tecnologias e processo penal

Como Citar

Magherescu, D. (2019). O uso de novos meios de tecnologia no processo penal da Romênia. Revista Brasileira De Direito Processual Penal, 5(3), 1189-1217. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v5i3.250