The rule of admissibility of evidence in the criminal process of continental Europe

Jerzy Skorupka

doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.526

Autores

Jerzy Skorupka Department of Criminal Procedure, University of Wroclaw http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6123-5538

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.526

Palavras-chave:

processo penal, direito probatório, admissibilidade da prova, legalidade dos atos estatais, postulado de integridade moral do sistema de justiça.

Resumo

Este artigo apresenta uma revisão doutrinária sobre a regra da admissibilidade da prova no processo penal da Europa continental, que pode ser entendida estritamente como aplicável somente à questão da admissibilidade, ou seja, da determinação de qual prova pode ser admitida. Essa regra pode também ser entendida em termos amplos e aplicada para determinar não somente a admissibilidade da prova, mas também a sua relevância e pertinência. Muita atenção foi direcionada para as funções desempenhadas pelas regras de admissibilidade, especialmente a sua função de garantia. Também são expostos o estado da discussão científica no reconhecimento de provas obtidas ilicitamente e a posição do autor sobre a questão.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

Jerzy Skorupka, Department of Criminal Procedure, University of Wroclaw

Professor, Director of the Department of Criminal Procedure, University of Wroclaw (Poland); Judge of the Appellate Court in Wroclaw (Poland).

Referências

AJSCHINES. II 155.

AMBROSE OF MILANO. Epistulae, 21.9

ARYSTOFANES. Osy. p. 919.

ARYSTOTELES. Retoryka. In: ARYSTOTELES. Dzieła wszystkie, v. 6. Warszawa 2001.

ASHWORTH, Andrew. Exploring the integrity principle in evidence and procedure. In: MIRFIELD, Peter. SMITH, Roger. Essays for Colin Tapper. Oxford-New York 2003

BONNER, Robert J. Evidence in Athenian Court. Chicago 1905

CANALE, Damiano. The Many Faces of the Codification of Law in Modern Continental Europe. In: PATTARO, Enrico, CANALE Damiano, GROSSI, Paolo, HOFMANN, Hasso, RILEY, Patrick (Eds.). A History of the Philosophy of Law in the Civil Law World, 1600-1900. Series A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Netherlands: Springer 2009, Online ISBN 978-90-481-2964-5.

CHAU, Peter. Excluding Integrity? Revisiting Non-Consequentialist Justifications for Excluding Improperly Obtained Evidence in Criminal Trials. In: HUNTER, Jill. ROBERTS, Paul. YOUNG, Simon. DIXON, David (Eds.) The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice. Oxford-Portland 2016

DEMOSTENES. VII 46.

DEMOSTENES. Przeciw Timokratesowi. p. 149-151.

DEMOSTENES. XIX 146

DEMOSTENES. XXI 95.

DEMOSTENES. XXVI 24.

DEMOSTENES. XXXV 14

DERSHOWITZ, Alan M. Is There a Torturous Road to Justice?, Los Angeles Times, 8.11.2001;

DERSHOWITZ, Alan M. Why terrorism works: Understanding the threat, responding to the challenge. Yale University Press, 2002

ESSLINGER, Detlef. Mildes Urteil im Folter-Prozess, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 21.12.2004

EUROPEAN CONVENTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, adopted in Rome on 4th November 1950. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf. (access: December 20, 2020).

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 1 June 2010, Gäfgen v Germany, no. 22978/05. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 11 February 2014, Cěsnieks v Latvia, no. 9278/06, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 11 July 2006, Jalloh v Germany, no. 54810/00, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 15 December 2005, Vanyan v Russia, no. 53203/99, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 2 December 2014, Taraneks v Latvia, no. 3082/06, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 21 September, Söylemez v Turkey, no. 46661/99, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 25 September 2012, El Haski v Belgium, no. 649/08, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 26 October, Khudobin v Russia, no. 59696/00, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 5 February 2008, Ramanauskas v Lithuania, no. 74420/01, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of 9 June 1998, Teixeira de Castro v Portugal, no. 44/1997/828/1034, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Judgment of April 2014, Lagutin and Others v Russia, no. 6228/09, 19123/09, 19678/07, 52340/08 and 7451/09, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

GAGARIN, Michael. Women in Athebian Court. Dike 1, p. 43, 1998.

GERSON, Jean. Summa contra Ioannem Parisiensem (Opera, 1.11.152). In: KELLY, John M. Historia zachodniej teorii prawa. Kraków 2006;

GIUFFRE, Vincenzo. La repressione criminale nell 'esperienza romana, Napoli 1997

GRAFFIN, Niel. The Legal consequences of Ill-treating Detainees held for Police Questioning in Breach of Article 3 ECHR. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, v. 20, no. 2, 2014, http://webjcli.org/article/view/339/437.

HARRISON, Alick Robin Walsham, The Law of Athens. Procedure. Oxford 1971

HYPEREJDES. V 33.

ISAJOS, XII 4.

ISIDORE OF SEVILLE. Sententiae, 3.51.

JOUSSE, Daniel. Traite de la justice criminelle. Paris: Debure 1771

KELLY, John M. A short history of western legal theory. Oxford University Press, 1992.

LEISI, Ernst. Der Zeuge im attischen Recht. Frauenfeld 1907

LIPSIUS, Justus Herman. Das attische Recht und Rechtsverfahren. Leipzig 1905-1915.

LITEWSKI Wiesław. Rzymski proces karny. Kraków 2003, p. 93.

LOCKE, John. Dwa traktaty o rządzie. London 1690

MACDOWELL, Douglas M. The Law in Classical Athens. London, 1978

MANFREDINI, Arnoldo D. La testimonianza del liberto contro il patrono nel processo criminale di età classica. In: Studi in onore di Arnaldo Biscardi. v. 3. Milano 1982

MIRHADY, David C. Athens’ Democratic Witness. Phoenix, 56/3, 2002.

SENECA, Medea, Poznań 2000

SLATER. Jerome. Tragic Choices in the War on Terrorism: Should We Try to Regulate and Control Torture? Political Science Quarterly, v. 121, no. 2, 2006

TOMASZ Z AKWINU. Summa teologiczna. Prawo, I-II, q. 96.5, Londyn 1986.

ZUMPT, August Wilhelm. Das Criminalrecht der Römischen Republik. Berlin 1869